✒️:. Ikkz Ikbal
Nepal is burning—and not because of earthquakes or politics-as-usual. It is burning because its youth have finally said, “Enough.”
When the government banned more than two dozen social media platforms last week, it thought it was tightening control. Instead, it sparked a Gen Z uprising that is shaking the Himalayan republic to its core.
This is not an old-fashioned protest. It is a rebellion of memes, hashtags, and digital slang. Placards reference anime, slogans mock “nepo babies,” and livestreams broadcast police violence to the world. What looks like frivolous youth culture is, in fact, a profound political message: you cannot silence a generation by pulling the plug on their platforms.
For years, Nepali politics has been a carousel of the same names, the same promises, the same failures. Corruption is entrenched, jobs are scarce, and nepotism is so blatant that ordinary young people feel the system is rigged against them. Add to this an elite class that treats state resources as private property, and you have the perfect recipe for anger simmering beneath the surface.
That anger boiled over earlier this month when the government abruptly banned more than two dozen social media platforms—Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube—claiming they had failed to register locally. TikTok and Viber survived because they complied with the rules, but for the country’s youth, this was not regulation. It was censorship. And censorship, as history tells us, rarely ends well.
What makes this uprising fascinating is not just its spontaneity but its language. This is not the politics of old men making long speeches in parliament. This is the politics of memes, hashtags, and digital symbols.
The protesters in Kathmandu carried placards referencing anime, scrawled slogans like #Nepobaby, and raised the Straw Hat pirate flag from the Japanese manga One Piece. What looks like pop culture cosplay is actually political genius: Gen Z is reframing dissent in its own vocabulary, refusing to play by the outdated rules of a jaded establishment.
In their world, satire bites harder than a sermon. A meme can sting more than a manifesto. And when police tear gas rains down, they livestream it, narrating their pain in real time to a global audience.
The government miscalculated the depth of discontent. The social media ban was meant to be a slap on the wrist; instead, it lit a bonfire of rage. Within hours of the ban, thousands of young people poured onto the streets, shouting against corruption, inequality, and political elitism.
The anger was not only digital. A recent viral incident—in which a government convoy allegedly hit an 11-year-old girl and sped away—had already left the public raw. The state’s indifference to accountability added fuel to the fire.
When security forces responded with water cannons, rubber bullets, and finally live ammunition, the protests turned bloody. By some estimates, nearly 20 people have died and hundreds have been injured. The streets of Kathmandu resemble a battleground, and the army now patrols the capital under curfew.
Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli, a seasoned political survivor, finally resigned—though he still clings on as a caretaker. The resignation is symbolic, but it does not solve the crisis. The question remains: what comes next?
Among the many names floated for interim leadership, one stands out: Sushila Karki, Nepal’s first female Chief Justice. Known for her honesty and fearlessness, she once challenged corruption head-on in the judiciary. Protesters see her as a rare figure untainted by politics, someone who could restore trust.
It is telling that Nepal’s youth are not rallying behind a traditional politician, but a jurist—a symbol of fairness in a deeply unfair system. Whether she will accept such a role remains to be seen, but the demand itself signals a generational rejection of “business as usual.”
Why Should We Care in Kashmir?
It is tempting to dismiss this as Nepal’s domestic drama. But across South Asia, the themes resonate loudly. In India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and yes, Kashmir too, youth frustration is universal: corruption, unemployment, nepotism, censorship, and the suffocating dominance of aging political elites.
Nepal is simply showing us what happens when a generation that has grown up online decides to take its grievances offline. They are teaching us that digital natives are not passive; they are capable of transforming a meme into a manifesto, and a hashtag into a movement.
A Region at the Crossroads
The geopolitical ripples cannot be ignored. Nepal sits delicately between India and China, both of which are watching nervously. For India, the unrest is worrying: open borders, stranded tourists, and the fear of instability spilling over. For China, which has invested heavily in Nepal under its Belt and Road Initiative, instability threatens economic and strategic interests.
But beyond geopolitics, there is a deeper lesson here for all of South Asia: ignore your youth at your peril. Suppress their voices, mock their memes, censor their platforms—and one day, they will rise.
At its core, this is not about social media platforms. This is about dignity. When a young Nepali graduate cannot find a job because a politician’s nephew got it instead, that is not an algorithm problem. When a convoy can kill a child without consequence, that is not a Facebook glitch.
Gen Z may speak in emojis and memes, but their cry is heartbreakingly human: “We want a future. We want fairness. We want freedom.”
The Road Ahead
The road ahead for Nepal is uncertain. The army’s presence may restore temporary order, but no number of soldiers can silence an idea whose time has come. The resignation of Oli is only the first crack in the dam. The real question is whether the old guard will listen, or whether they will try to smother the uprising with brute force.
If they choose the latter, they risk radicalizing an entire generation. If they choose the former, Nepal could—against all odds—enter a new chapter of accountability and reform.
It is easy for older generations to dismiss the youth as frivolous, distracted, addicted to screens. But Nepal shows us something profound: those screens can also become mirrors reflecting injustice, and megaphones demanding change.
In the end, this is not just Nepal’s story. It is the story of every society where the gap between rulers and the ruled has grown unbearable. And it reminds us that revolutions no longer begin in secret meetings or smoky tea shops—they begin on smartphones, in hashtags, in the creativity of a restless generation.
Ikkz Ikbal has a PG in Biotechnology and is Principal at Maryam Memorial Institute Pandithpora Qaziabad. He X’s @IkkzIkbal and can be mailed @ ikkzikbal@gmail.com.